Computer Compare Computer:SAMSUNG 830 Series 2.5-Inch 512GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-7PC512B/WW

Computer See SAMSUNG 830 Series 2.5-Inch 512GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-7PC512B/WW Details

List Price : $819.52 Price : $439.99 as of 2013-02-19 10:40 AM

Product Description

SAMSUNG 830 Series MZ-7PC512B/WW 2.5" 512GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

• Type of Drive :SSD
• Form Factor:2.5-inch
• Interface SATA3 (SATA 6Gbits/s)
• Random Read Speeds: 80,000 IOPS
• Memory Type Toggle DDR 2xnm class NAND Flash
• Sequential Read/Write Speeds: 520 MB/s / 160 MB/s

More About SAMSUNG 830 Series 2.5-Inch 512GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-7PC512B/WW

Most employees just accept the reality that their employer can access any content that's on a enterprise computer, which include employees personal emails and other personal information. But, is that the law? A growing number of courts appear to be recognizing that employees have some expectation of privacy along with other respect for their personal content on organization computers. Some recent decisions have held that employers do not own and cannot access their employees personal emails not even when those emails were sent on a organization computer.

Marina Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc. is really a workplace privacy case that was decided on June 26, 2009. Marina Stengart worked as an Executive Director of Nursing at Loving Care Agency, Inc. Loving Care provided Stengart using a company computer and an email address to complete her work duties. Loving Care had an electronic communications policy Which stated that emails, Web use and computer files appear to be considered the companys property and are not to be considered private or personal to any individual employee. The policy at the same time stated that the enterprise had the correct to review, audit, intercept, access, and disclose all matters on the companys media systems and services at any time, with other or without having notice.

Stengart used her organization computer to email her attorneys about filing a discrimination lawsuit against Loving Care. But, Stengart did not use her organization email address. She emailed her attorneys along with other her personal, password protected Yahoo email account although employing her enterprise computer. Stengart resigned in one her employment and sued Loving Care for discrimination. Loving Care then searched Stengarts organization computer and, pursuant to its electronic communications policy, read the emails Stengart exchanged with her attorneys. Stengart angered by Loving Cares reading of her personal emails, asked the Court to evaluate if Loving Care had the right under its electronic communications policy to read emails she sent to her attorneys via her personal email account on her company computer.

The Stengart Court rejected the notion that an employees personal emails turn into company property simply because the organization owns the computer, claiming that a organization computer in this setting is little far more than a file cabinet: "Property rights appear to be no much less offended when an employer examines documents stored on a computer as when an employer rifles through a folder containing an employees private papers or reaches in and examines the contents of an employees pockets; indeed, even when a legitimate company purpose can frequently support such a search, we can imagine no valid precept of property law that would convert the employers interest in determining what's in those places with a right to own the contents of these employees folder of private papers or the contents of his pocket." The Court ruled against Loving Care, concluding that an employer cannot transform all private communications into business property -- merely because the enterprise owned the computer utilized to make the private communications or utilized to access such private Info during work hours.

Marina Stengart asked the Court if her employer had the right to view her personal emails. Bonnie Van Alstyne took the workplace privacy notion a step further when she sued her former employer for accessing her personal emails. Bonnie Van Alstyne worked as a Vice President at Electronic Scriptorium Limited, a small data conversion business owned and operated by Edward Leonard. Van Alstyne had a business email account, but she occasionally employed her personal AOL email account to conduct business. Van Alstynes employment was terminated and she filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against the company. during the discovery process, Van Alstyne learned that Edward Leonard accessed her personal email account both during and after her employment. Leonard produced 258 emails he had printed in one Van Alstynes personal email account.

Van Alstyne filed a separate lawsuit against Leonard, Bonnie Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium Limited, et al. Her lawsuit alleged that Leonard violated the Stored Communications Act when he accessed her personal email account and viewed her emails. The Stored Communications Act creates criminal and civil liability for any individual who intentionally accesses with out authorization a facility through And this an electronic communication service is provided or intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility and obtains, alters, or prevents authorized use of a wire or electronic communication while It is in electronic storage in such system. In other words, the Stored Communication Act prohibits an individual from, among other things, intentionally accessing other peoples stored emails, voicemails, text messages, etc. with no permission. A jury located that Leonard violated the Stored Communications Act and awarded Van Alstyne $250,000 in compensatory and punitive damages and far more compared to $136,000 in attorneys fees and costs.

The law is changing. Courts seem to be recognizing that employees have a right to privacy in their personal emails even if those emails are sent on company computers as well as when company policy says otherwise. But, both Marina Stengarts and Bonnie Van Alstynes employers read their personal emails Which gave their employers valuable defensive Info and severely prejudiced Stengart and Van Alstyne in their pending lawsuits. A lawsuit cannot unring that bell. And, Stengart and Van Alstyne were forced into lengthy, costly legal battles to enforce their privacy rights. It is encouraging that courts seem to be recognizing employee privacy rights and giving employees remedies when those rights appear to be violated. However, the best course of action is to keep your own email and your business computer separate thereby eliminating any possibility that your employer will view your own emails.

SAMSUNG 830 Series 2.5-Inch 512GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-7PC512B/WW Reviews

SAMSUNG 830 Series 2.5-Inch 512GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-7PC512B/WW:Computer