Computer See Dell Inspiron 660s i660s-3848BK Desktop Details
List Price : $400.00 Price : $389.95
as of 2013-02-09 10:07 AM
Product Description
The space-saving Inspiron 660s comes standard with wireless card, USB 3.0 and HDMI to help you quickly connect to your camera, MP3 player, printer and other devices
Amazon.com
Inspiron 660s (i660s-3848BK) at a glance...
- Processor: Intel® Pentium® G645 (2.90 GHz, 3MB Cache)
- Operating system: Windows® 8 Home (English), 64-bit
- Memory (RAM): 4GB DDR3 SDRAM (1600 MHz)
- Storage (hard drive): 500GB SATA (7200 RPM), 3.5"
- Optical drive: Tray Load Drive, 16x DVD+RW
- Video graphics: Integrated Intel® HD Graphics
- Media card reader: 8-in-1
- Audio: Integrated 5.1 audio
- Preinstalled software: McAfee® SecurityCenter (30-day trial), CMS - Cyberlink Media Suite Essentials
- Included hardware: Dell USB keyboard and USB optical mouse (wired)
i660s-3848bk datasheet
(PDF, 1.37MB)
(PDF, 1.37MB)
Photo Gallery
- Intel Pentium G645 processor, (2.90 GHz)
- 4GB DDR3
- 500GB hard drive (7200 rpm)
- Windows 8
More About Dell Inspiron 660s i660s-3848BK Desktop
Most employees just accept the fact that their employer can access any content that is on a organization computer, such as employees personal emails and other personal information. But, is that the law? A growing number of courts seem to be recognizing that employees have some expectation of privacy with other respect to their personal content on business computers. Some recent decisions have held that employers don't own and cannot access their employees personal emails not even if those emails were sent on a enterprise computer.Marina Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc. is extremely a workplace privacy case that was decided on June 26, 2009. Marina Stengart worked as an Executive Director of Nursing at Loving Care Agency, Inc. Loving Care provided Stengart using a business computer and an email address to accomplish her work duties. Loving Care had an electronic communications policy And also this stated that emails, World wide web use and computer files seem to be considered the companys property and are not to be considered private or personal to any individual employee. The policy as well stated that the business had the proper to review, audit, intercept, access, and disclose all matters around the companys media systems and services at any time, with other or without having notice.
Stengart used her organization computer to email her attorneys about filing a discrimination lawsuit against Loving Care. But, Stengart did not use her enterprise email address. She emailed her attorneys with her personal, password protected Yahoo email account although making use of her organization computer. Stengart resigned from one her employment and sued Loving Care for discrimination. Loving Care then searched Stengarts business computer and, pursuant to its electronic communications policy, read the emails Stengart exchanged with other her attorneys. Stengart angered by Loving Cares reading of her personal emails, asked the Court to determine if Loving Care had the right under its electronic communications policy to read emails she sent to her attorneys by way of her personal email account on her organization computer.
The Stengart Court rejected the notion that an employees personal emails become company property simply due into the fact the company owns the computer, claiming that a enterprise computer in this setting is little more than a file cabinet: "Property rights seem to be no much less offended when an employer examines documents stored on a computer as when an employer rifles by means of a folder containing an employees private papers or reaches in and examines the contents of an employees pockets; indeed, even when a legitimate company purpose can frequently support such a search, we can picture no valid precept of property law that would convert the employers interest in determining what is in those places using a right to own the contents of those employees folder of private papers or the contents of his pocket." The Court ruled against Loving Care, concluding that an employer cannot transform all private communications into organization property -- merely because the enterprise owned the computer employed to create the private communications or used to access such private Info during work hours.
Marina Stengart asked the Court if her employer had the proper to view her personal emails. Bonnie Van Alstyne took the workplace privacy notion a step further when she sued her former employer for accessing her personal emails. Bonnie Van Alstyne worked as a Vice President at Electronic Scriptorium Limited, a small data conversion company owned and operated by Edward Leonard. Van Alstyne had a enterprise email account, but she occasionally utilized her personal AOL email account to conduct business. Van Alstynes employment was terminated and she filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against the company. through the discovery process, Van Alstyne learned that Edward Leonard accessed her personal email account both during and after her employment. Leonard produced 258 emails he had printed from Van Alstynes personal email account.
Van Alstyne filed a separate lawsuit against Leonard, Bonnie Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium Limited, et al. Her lawsuit alleged that Leonard violated the Stored Communications Act when he accessed her personal email account and viewed her emails. The Stored Communications Act creates criminal and civil liability for any individual who intentionally accesses with no authorization a facility through And this an electronic communication service is provided or intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility and obtains, alters, or prevents authorized use of a wire or electronic communication although It's in electronic storage in such system. In other words, the Stored Communication Act prohibits an individual from, among other things, intentionally accessing other peoples stored emails, voicemails, text messages, etc. with no permission. A jury found that Leonard violated the Stored Communications Act and awarded Van Alstyne $250,000 in compensatory and punitive damages and a lot more than $136,000 in attorneys fees and costs.
The law is changing. Courts are recognizing that employees have a right to privacy in their personal emails even if those emails are sent on organization computers and even when company policy says otherwise. But, both Marina Stengarts and Bonnie Van Alstynes employers read their personal emails Which gave their employers valuable defensive Info and severely prejudiced Stengart and Van Alstyne in their pending lawsuits. A lawsuit cannot unring that bell. And, Stengart and Van Alstyne were forced into lengthy, high-priced legal battles to enforce their privacy rights. It is encouraging that courts appear to be recognizing employee privacy rights and giving employees remedies when those rights are violated. However, the best course of action would be to maintain your own email and your organization computer separate thereby eliminating any possibility that your employer will view your own emails.
Dell Inspiron 660s i660s-3848BK Desktop Reviews
Dell Inspiron 660s i660s-3848BK Desktop:Computer
No comments:
Post a Comment